WazzuCoug
Member
I'll say up front that if counting calories feels good and right for you, then it is good and right for you.
However, I've also seen people get so obsessed with calories that they seem to be on the verge of a stress bomb about it and are focusing a lot on how much they are eating instead of what they are eating. Not everyone, of course. If you find something that works for you, stick with it! But for people who stress out a bit too much about calories, I would suggest letting some of that go and switching to more concentration on food quality and finding the right foods for your biology.
Here are a few reasons why counting calories is mostly wasted time:
Food Labels:
Calorie trackers and scanners just enter the same faulty calorie information that is on the labels, so they don't come with any amount of reliable accuracy.
Effective Food Calories:
Effective calories can vary depending on what form a food is. A serving of whole almonds might be 130 calories, but the same amount of almonds ground would actually be 180 calories because of the difference in their cellular structure after being ground up. That is a 50 calorie difference even though the amount of almonds used in each serving was the same. However, if the whole almonds and same amount of ground almonds were side by side in packages, they would be labeled with the exact same calories.
Two people can metabolize calories very differently. Taking almonds for example again. One person can metabolize that 130 calorie serving and only get 69 calories of energy, but the person next to her eating the same serving of almonds may metabolize the serving as 180 calories. That means one person is getting the equivalent of 777 extra calories of energy in a week. This can apply to any food. How each person metabolizes food is highly unique, which is why you'll often see me write that finding the right foods for yourself are more important than following a specific "named diet" or being religious about counting calories.
Yes, we do have to burn more calories than we take in to lose weight, but it’s not about counting the average calories, it is how you metabolize the calories. As a unit of measurement, a calorie is a calorie, but as food energy, a calorie is definitely not a calorie.
A study with identical twins for 100 days illustrated this difference calorie metabolism. 12 pairs of identical twins were put on identical diets and fed an extra 1000 calories/day for 6 days a week for 100 days. Their diets were closely monitored. The average weight gain was 8kg, BUT the difference between identical twins eating the exact same food show that in some cases one twin gained just 6 Kg, but their mirror image gained over 13kg - almost twice as much eating the same calories!! It wasn't genetics at play between the identical twins, it was their microbiome and how they metabolize the same foods.
Some people feel good about counting, and that’s great, but for others it can be stressful and unsustainable and have negative psychological impacts - fixation on numbers instead of food.
What should you do?
A lot of people who count are also making good food choices, which again, is probably the real reason for success, not that fact that they are tracking calories, but that they are choosing the right foods for them. Someone else could be counting the exact same number of calories and not having much success because they might be eating the same calories of processed "healthy food" or even unhealthy foods, or they are just eating the wrong combination of foods their body doesn't metabolize well. They are both counting, but getting very different results.
This is all "food for thought" and nothing more. No need to change what you are doing, but some stuff to think about.
However, I've also seen people get so obsessed with calories that they seem to be on the verge of a stress bomb about it and are focusing a lot on how much they are eating instead of what they are eating. Not everyone, of course. If you find something that works for you, stick with it! But for people who stress out a bit too much about calories, I would suggest letting some of that go and switching to more concentration on food quality and finding the right foods for your biology.
Here are a few reasons why counting calories is mostly wasted time:
Food Labels:
- Food labels are allowed by the FDA to be up to 20% off - higher or lower
- Food companies manipulate the serving size to make it appear the calories/sugar/salt/fat are lower than what people would truly eat.
Calorie trackers and scanners just enter the same faulty calorie information that is on the labels, so they don't come with any amount of reliable accuracy.
Effective Food Calories:
Effective calories can vary depending on what form a food is. A serving of whole almonds might be 130 calories, but the same amount of almonds ground would actually be 180 calories because of the difference in their cellular structure after being ground up. That is a 50 calorie difference even though the amount of almonds used in each serving was the same. However, if the whole almonds and same amount of ground almonds were side by side in packages, they would be labeled with the exact same calories.
Two people can metabolize calories very differently. Taking almonds for example again. One person can metabolize that 130 calorie serving and only get 69 calories of energy, but the person next to her eating the same serving of almonds may metabolize the serving as 180 calories. That means one person is getting the equivalent of 777 extra calories of energy in a week. This can apply to any food. How each person metabolizes food is highly unique, which is why you'll often see me write that finding the right foods for yourself are more important than following a specific "named diet" or being religious about counting calories.
Yes, we do have to burn more calories than we take in to lose weight, but it’s not about counting the average calories, it is how you metabolize the calories. As a unit of measurement, a calorie is a calorie, but as food energy, a calorie is definitely not a calorie.
A study with identical twins for 100 days illustrated this difference calorie metabolism. 12 pairs of identical twins were put on identical diets and fed an extra 1000 calories/day for 6 days a week for 100 days. Their diets were closely monitored. The average weight gain was 8kg, BUT the difference between identical twins eating the exact same food show that in some cases one twin gained just 6 Kg, but their mirror image gained over 13kg - almost twice as much eating the same calories!! It wasn't genetics at play between the identical twins, it was their microbiome and how they metabolize the same foods.
Some people feel good about counting, and that’s great, but for others it can be stressful and unsustainable and have negative psychological impacts - fixation on numbers instead of food.
What should you do?
- If calorie counting works for you, keep doing it
- However, if it doesn't seem to work for you then: don’t count calories, focus on quality protein, plants and nourishment
- Eat more plants and whole, minimally processed foods with an intact food matrix
- Learn what works best for YOUR body and get your biology on your side
- If you think you should be losing and you aren't, consider experimenting with your foods
- No matter which diet you choose, the following core recommendations can apply to any diet (keto, paleo, other low carb, low fat, mediterranean, vegetarian (in all forms), vegan or other):
- No ultra processed foods (10 ingredients or more)
- Minimize other processed food & refined grains
- A wide variety of plants (any form, veggies, herbs, spices, fungus, nuts, seeds, fruits, berries, etc)
- No foods with added sugar
- Avoid artificial sweeteners
A lot of people who count are also making good food choices, which again, is probably the real reason for success, not that fact that they are tracking calories, but that they are choosing the right foods for them. Someone else could be counting the exact same number of calories and not having much success because they might be eating the same calories of processed "healthy food" or even unhealthy foods, or they are just eating the wrong combination of foods their body doesn't metabolize well. They are both counting, but getting very different results.
This is all "food for thought" and nothing more. No need to change what you are doing, but some stuff to think about.
Last edited: